Commercial Banking, Collections, and Bankruptcy

 (Tom Cullerton, D-Villa Park) creates a “resident’s representative” under this Act that allows a resident to choose someone to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social, or other personal information of the resident; manage financial matters; or receive notifications.

It will also include the following: 

(2) A person authorized by State or federal law, including, but not limited to, agents under power of attorney, representative payees, and other fiduciaries, to act on behalf of the resident in order to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social, or other personal information of the resident; manage financial matters; or receive notifications.

(3) A legal representative, as used in Section 712 of the federal Older Americans Act (42 U.S.C. 3058g); or

(4) The court-appointed guardian or conservator of a resident.

Nothing in this definition is intended to expand the scope of authority of any resident’s representative beyond that authority specifically authorized by the resident, State or federal law, or a court of competent jurisdiction.

(Fine, D-Glenview) deletes language providing that specified records may be inspected “only for a proper purpose.” Also deletes language that in an action to compel examination of specified records, the burden of proof is upon the member to establish that the member's request is based on a proper purpose. Scheduled for hearing this Thursday in House Judiciary Committee. 

(Hurley, D-Chicago) removes a repeal date of June 1, 2018 in a Section concerning a county recorder's ability to establish procedures for investigating filings that would cause the recorder to reasonably believe that the filing may be fraudulent, unlawfully altered, or intended to unlawfully cloud or transfer the title of any real property. On second reading in the House. 

(Barickman, R-Bloomington) redefines “omitted subordinate interest” to include a person who was a named party in the foreclosure action over which the court lacked personal jurisdiction due to defective service of process.

The foreclosure proceeding may be reopened as to the defendant only if the defendant: (1) was a named party in the foreclosure action over which the court lacked personal jurisdiction due to defective service of process; and (2) has a meritorious defense to the foreclosure action. After the foreclosure proceeding is reopened, if the defendant is unsuccessful in defeating the foreclosure action, then the defendant shall have the option to redeem pursuant to subsection (e) of this Section. Nothing contained in this Section affects any existing right that the holder of the certificate of sale or any person who acquired title under Section 15-1509 or any subsequent successor, assignee, transferee, or grantee of that person may have against the defendant or the real estate.

The redemption period shall extend 30 days after the entry of the order if the defendant has not been in possession of the real estate for a period of six months before entry of the order.

If an omitted subordinate interest asserts a challenge to the jurisdiction of the trial court following confirmation of the sale and transfer of title to the mortgaged real estate to a non-party to the underlying foreclosure action who acquired title for value, the trial court shall permit the non-party to retain possession of the mortgaged real estate pending entry of a final order relative to the jurisdiction challenge and any subsequent proceedings in the foreclosure action if the non-party provides adequate security for any loss of use or occupancy by the person who has the omitted subordinate interest. For purposes of this Section, a bond presented to, approved by, and filed with the court shall be deemed to provide adequate security.

Senate Amendment No. 1 was filed last week. 

(Barickman, R-Bloomington) redefines “omitted subordinate interest” to include a person who was a named party in the foreclosure action over which the court lacked personal jurisdiction due to defective service of process.

The foreclosure proceeding may be reopened as to the defendant only if the defendant: (1) was a named party in the foreclosure action over which the court lacked personal jurisdiction due to defective service of process; and (2) has a meritorious defense to the foreclosure action. After the foreclosure proceeding is reopened, if the defendant is unsuccessful in defeating the foreclosure action, then the defendant shall have the option to redeem pursuant to subsection (e) of this Section. Nothing contained in this Section affects any existing right that the holder of the certificate of sale or any person who acquired title under Section 15-1509 or any subsequent successor, assignee, transferee, or grantee of that person may have against the defendant or the real estate.

The redemption period shall extend 30 days after the entry of the order if the defendant has not been in possession of the real estate for a period of six months before entry of the order.

If an omitted subordinate interest asserts a challenge to the jurisdiction of the trial court following confirmation of the sale and transfer of title to the mortgaged real estate to a non-party to the underlying foreclosure action who acquired title for value, the trial court shall permit the non-party to retain possession of the mortgaged real estate pending entry of a final order relative to the jurisdiction challenge and any subsequent proceedings in the foreclosure action if the non-party provides adequate security for any loss of use or occupancy by the person who has the omitted subordinate interest. For purposes of this Section, a bond presented to, approved by, and filed with the court shall be deemed to provide adequate security.

Senate Amendment No. 1 was filed last week. 

(Welch, D-Westchester) replaces references to the term “transfer instrument” with “transfer.” Changes the definitions of “family member” and “transfer.” Provides that if the court determines the transferor lacked the requisite capacity to convey, the entire transfer instrument shall be deemed void. Provides that if the property in question is an interest in real property, a purchaser or mortgagee for value and without notice, before the recordation of a lis pendens for an action, shall take free and clear of the action. Provides that a holder of property shall not be liable for distributing or releasing the property to the transferee if the distribution or release occurs before the holder becomes a party to an action challenging the transfer. Scheduled for hearing in House Judiciary Committee March 8.