Local Government Law

Marcavage v. City of Chicago

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Civil Court
First Amendment
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 09-3335 & 09-4079 Cons.
Decision Date: 
October 4, 2011
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed and reversed in part and remanded
Dist. Ct. did not err in granting defendants-police officials’ motion for summary judgment in action alleging that defendants violated plaintiffs’ (individuals representing Christian group) First Amendment rights when defendants ordered plaintiffs to change location of their outreach activities that were being conducted on sidewalks near Soldier Field and Wrigley Field during 2006 Gay Games. Record showed that defendants told plaintiffs to “keep moving” from their sidewalk locations to nearby locations off sidewalks for purpose of avoiding interference with heavy pedestrian traffic at Games, and that said directives were content neutral and were not overly broad where alternative locations allowed plaintiffs to continue their activities. Fact that plaintiffs preferred sidewalks did not render alternative locations inadequate. Moreover, defendants’ actions in precluding plaintiffs from conducting outreach activities at Navy Pier due to their lack of permit did not violate any First Amendment rights where Navy Pier was non-public forum, and where plaintiffs made no attempt to obtain required permit. Remand, though was required with respect to defendants’ denial of plaintiffs’ attempt to conduct outreach activities at Gateway Park due to lack of permit since said Park was public forum, and record failed to contain rationale for instant permit requirement. (Partial dissent filed.)

The Reserve at Woodstock v. The City of Woodstock

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Zoning
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (2d) 100676
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
McHenry Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
BOWMAN
Plaintiff submitted plat to develop 10 acres of property per annexation agreement. City denied plat and rezoned and disconnected the property. Plaintiff then filed suit against City. Court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff on two counts. Court properly entered judgment in Plaintiff's favor as to three other counts, as Plaintiff had acquired a vested right in the approval of its plat under prior zoning ordinance. City's actions of rezoning and disconnecting property violated its duty of good faith and fair dealing, as a matter of law. (JORGENSEN and McLAREN, concurring.)

Ferguson v. Georges

Illinois Supreme Court PLAs
Civil Court
Privilege
Citation
PLA issue Date: 
September 28, 2011
Docket Number: 
No. 112488
District: 
1st Dist.
This case presents question as to whether trial court properly dismissed action by plaintiff-Chicago Inspector General seeking to enforce subpoena issued against defendant-Chicago Corporate Counsel for certain un-redacted copies of documents that defendant claimed were shielded from discovery by attorney-client privilege? Appellate Court, in reversing trial court, found that plaintiff had authority to retain private counsel for purpose of filing instant lawsuit, and that remand was necessary to determine whether subpoenaed documents were shielded by attorney-client privilege. (Dissent filed.)

LeCompte v. Zoning Board of Appeal for the Village of Barrington Hills

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Zoning
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (1st) 100423
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
NEVILLE
Village Zoning Board upheld a Village order directing homeowners to stop using their property for commercial boarding of horses because it was not a permitted agricultural use in R-1 zoned district. Commercial boarding of horses is not "agriculture" as defined in Village's Zoning Code. That "animal husbandry" and "breeding and raising horses" are described as included within Code's definition of agriculture does not indicate that commercial boarding is considered as agriculture. (QUINN and MURPHY, concurring.)

Public Act 97-504

Topic: 
Open Meetings Act and training compliance
(Burke, D-Oak Lawn; Crotty, D-Oak Forest) changes the compliance date for the Attorney General's electronic training of elected or appointed members of a public body. If you are a member on Jan. 1, 2012, you must complete the training by Jan. 1, 2013. If you become a member after Jan. 1, 2012, you must complete the training no later than 90 days after you are sworn into office or assume the duties of office. School board members may comply by participating in training sponsored or conducted by an organization under Section 23 of the School Code. Effective Jan. 1, 2012.

Public Act 97-579

Topic: 
FOIA and "recurrent requesters"
(Currie, D-Chicago; Harmon, D-Oak Park) creates separate FOIA guidelines for "recurrent requestors" to be answered within a reasonable period considering the size and complexity of the request. A "recurrent requestors" is a person who in the 12 months immediately preceding a request has submitted to the same public body any of the following: (1) a minimum of 50 requests for records, (2) a minimum of 15 requests for records within a 30-day period, or (3)seven requests within a seven-day period. News media and non-profit, scientific or academic organizations are exempt if the principal purpose of the request is academic, scientific, or public research or education. A requestor for commercial purposes may not appeal to the public access counselor except for the limited purpose of reviewing whether the public body properly determined that the request was made for a commercial purpose. Effective August 26, 2011.

Demos v. Pappas

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Interest
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (1st) 100829
Decision Date: 
Monday, August 15, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
ROCHFORD
Court improperly imposed 9% interest on indemnity-fund judgment, per postjudgment interest provision of Interest Act. Provision in Act for 6% interest should apply to judgment, as Treasurer, who is judgment debtor and as trustee of indemnity fund is a governmental entity. Indemnity fund falls within definition of "county moneys" and is not "private property." Fund consists of monies held for future awards for unspecified persons, and excesses in indemnity fund may revert to general fund of county. (HALL and LAMPKIN, concurring.)

Public Act 97-552

Topic: 
Municipalities and zoning
(Senger; R-Naperville; Sandack, R-Downers Grove) allows municipalities of fewer than 500,000 to adopt rules of procedure or authorize zoning board of appeals and any other board, commission, or committee that conducts similar public hearings to do so. Effective August 25, 2011.

Public Act 97-561

Topic: 
Repeat offenders of county ordinances
(Gordon, D-Peoria; Koehler, D-Peoria) allows a “repeat offender” of property maintenance codes to be served by a notice to appear. A repeat offender is any person who has been found guilty of two or more similar violations of a property maintenance code at the same location in a 36-month period. Effective January 1, 2012.

Public Act 97-561

Topic: 
Repeat offenders of county ordinances
(Gordon, D-Peoria; Koehler, D-Peoria) allows a “repeat offender” of property maintenance codes to be served by a notice to appear. A repeat offender is any person who has been found guilty of two or more similar violations of a property maintenance code at the same location in a 36-month period. Effective January 1, 2012.