Real Estate Law

In re The Application of County Treasurer

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Tax Deeds
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (4th) 170003
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Champaign Co.
Holding: 
Reversed.
Justice: 
APPLETON

Refund requested by tax purchaser, in the amount  of $188,085 which it paid to redeem sale of 2008 taxes, is contrary to Section 22-40(a) of Property Tax Code. It is impossible to obtain declaration of a sale in error while retaining title to the property. Plaintiff never became liable for tax delinquencies that arose after tax sale to Plaintiff; instead, Plaintiff chose to pay taxes for those additional years.(HARRIS and HOLDER WHITE, concurring.)

Public Act 100-478

Topic: 
Adult dependent child

(Andersson, R-Geneva; Schimpf, R-Murphysboro) amends statutory awards from a decedent's estate to an "adult dependent child."

(1) It creates a separate statutory award for adult dependent child for at least $5,000, but it gives the court discretion to award whatever sum it deems reasonable or agreed upon by the surviving spouse and representative of the decedent's estate or affiant under a small-estate affidavit.

(2) It links the statute to the adult child's financial dependency on the decedent family member.

(3) It creates a process to make the statute work more effectively by requiring the adult child, adult child's agent or guardian, or other adult on behalf of the adult child to provide written notice to the representative or affiant asserting the adult dependent child's financial dependency on the decedent after receipt of a probate notice advising them of this potential award.

Effective June 1, 2018.

Ovnik v. Podolskey

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Landlord Tenant
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 162987
Decision Date: 
Friday, September 1, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN

Plaintiffs filed suit for damages for landlord's failure to return two security deposits for rental of townhouse, under Chicago Residential Landlord and Tenant Ordinance. Court granted summary judgment for Plaintiff and awarded $19,125, and an additional $25,200 for attorney's fees, costs and interest. Circuit court's judgment in favor of named lessee company on arbitrator's award resolved lessee's right to relief based on both security deposits, and identity of causes of action exists. Because question of fact exists as to whether Plaintiff (wife of lessee company's sole shareholder) was in privity with company, whether res judicata applies should not have been resolved on summary judgment. (ROCHFORD, concurring; DELORT, specially concurring.)

Neighborhood Lending Services, Inc. v. Callahan

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 162585
Decision Date: 
Friday, September 1, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
ROCHFORD

Court had subject matter jurisdiction over mortgage foreclosure action. Mortgagee properly complied with requirement that mortgagor is a necessary part defendant to proceedings by naming special representative of decedent who held interest in property. Mortgagee properly served nonrecord claimants by publication, and properly recorded a lis pendens and notice of foreclosure, and properly issued a notice of sale. Thus court properly confirmed sale and denied motion to reconsider order. (HOFFMAN and DELORT, concurring.)

Public Act 100-292

Topic: 
Omnibus condo legislation

(Thapedi, D-Chicago; Raoul, D-Chicago) makes numerous changes affecting community associations and condos. Among other changes, it amends the statute governing the examination of a condo association's records. In addition, it authorizes reasonable attorney's fees and costs to a unit member who prevails in an enforcement action if seeking to examine or copy (1) all contracts to which the association is a party or under which it or the unit owners have obligations and (2) the books and records for the association's current fiscal year and the last 10 fiscal years. It also reduces the time in which an association must make these records available from 30 business days to 10 business days or it will be considered a denial of the request.

It also amends the right to examine and copy the ballot and proxy information and current listing of the names, addresses, email addresses, telephone numbers, and weighted vote of all voting members. A member must have a purpose that relates to the association to exercise this right, and the board may ask for the member to so certify. The member may not seek these records for a "commercial purpose," which is defined as use in any form for sale, resale, or solicitation or advertisement for sales or services.

A member may recover attorney's fees and costs only if a court finds the board of directors acted in bad faith in denying the request. It also makes it discretionary instead of mandatory whether the association must charge for the retrieval or copying of these records.

Effective January 1, 2018.

Public Act 100-416

Topic: 
Installment Sales Contract Act

(Koehler, D-Peoria; Gordon-Booth, D-Peoria) creates the Installment Sales Contract Act. It will require that sales of residential real estate by installment contract conform to the Act and that vendors in installment real estate contracts foreclose using Illinois foreclosure law. "Residential real estate" means real estate with a dwelling structure excluding property that is sold as a part of a tract of land consisting of four acres or more that is zoned for agricultural purposes.

It applies to sellers that enter into an installment sale contract more than three times during a 12-month period to sell residential real estate. Within 10 days of the date of sale the seller must record the contract or a memorandum of the contract with the recorder of deeds. It prohibits the installment sale contract from forbidding the buyer to record the contract or a memorandum of the contract. It makes it a violation of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act to knowingly violate the Installment Sales Contract.

Effective January 1, 2018.

Country Club Estates Condominium Association v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Condominium Property Act
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 162459
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
MASON

in order to extinguish presale assessments under section 9(g)(3) of Condominium Property Act, a foreclosure buyer must make prompt payment of assessments after acquiring the property. Summary judgment for Defendant was improper because a material question of fact exists as to whether its tender, seven months after acquiring the unit, can be considered prompt. (HYMAN and PIERCE, concurring.) 

Madden v. Scott

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Easements
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (1st) 162149
Decision Date: 
Friday, August 11, 2017
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HOFFMAN

Court properly granted implied easement and easement by prescription over a portion of a condominium unit owned by them for purposes of ingress from, and adjoining condo unit. Evidence supports court’s finding that each element necessary for establishment of an implied easement over that portion of certain unit located within vestibule for purposes of ingress and egress to and from another unit was satisfied; and that Plaintiffs’ period of use itself satisfied the 20-year adverse, continuous and uninterrupted use requirements. Plaintiffs openly used vestibule for access to their unit for 20 years, some 5 years before use was interrupted when sliding glass door to vestibule was locked.  (ROCHFORD and DELORT, concurring.)

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Norris

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Mortgage Foreclosure
Citation
Case Number: 
2017 IL App (3d) 150764
Decision Date: 
Monday, July 3, 2017
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Rock Island Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CARTER

Bank filed foreclosure action, and court granted summary judgment for bank. Preperty was then sold at foreclosure sale which court confirmed.  The single refiling rule (Section 13-217 of Code of Civil Procedure) is not intended to permit multiple refilings of same cause of action, but to permit one refiling of a claim, even if applicable statute of limitations has not expired. The 2010 foreclosure case was not a refiling of the 2008 foreclosure case, as operative facts of 2 cases are substantially different.  The mortgage foreclosure complaint here (2012 case) is the first and only refiling of the 2008 case), and the single refiling rule was not violated.(McDADE and SCHMIDT, concurring.)