Real Estate Law

Public Act 99-743

Topic: 
Mendelson and trusts

(Silverstein, D-Chicago; Lang, D-Chicago) seeks to reverse the holding of the Mendelson case (2016 IL App (2d) 150084). It provides that the transfer of real property to a trust requires a transfer of legal title to the trustee evidenced by a written instrument of conveyance and acceptance by the trustee. Provides that for any interest in real property to become trust property in a trust of which any transferor is a trustee, the instrument of conveyance shall additionally be recorded in the appropriate real property records.  

Effective January 1, 2017.

Public Act 99-612

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act and the Condominium Property Act

(Cassidy, D-Chicago; Mulroe, D-Chicago) redefines “acceptable technological means” to mean any generally available technology that, by rule of the association, is deemed to provide reasonable security, reliability, identification, and verifiability. Allows acceptable technological means to be used to conduct association business such as a notice required to be sent or received; signature, vote, consent, or approval required to be obtained; and the performance of obligations or exercise of rights. It does not apply to any notices required under the Forcible Entry and Detainer Article or in connection with foreclosure proceedings in enforcement of any lien rights under the Acts.

Effective January 1, 2017.

 

 

Public Act 99-609

Topic: 
Land Trust Beneficiary Rights Act

(Williams, D-Chicago; Hastings, D-Matteson) provides that the rights of a beneficial owner may not be impaired in any way by the change of trustees if the identity of the trustee of a land trust has been changed by virtue of sale, assignment, appointment, or otherwise, but the beneficial owner or owners of the land trust remain unchanged. Provides that a change of trustees by a sale, acquisition, or appointment governed by the Corporate Fiduciaries Act is not a bar or defense to any court action filed by or in the name of either the previous trustee or the new trustee, regardless of whether the court action was originally filed in a representative capacity on behalf of the beneficial owner or owners.

Effective January 1, 2017.

 

Public Act 99-627

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act

(Haine, D-Alton; Beiser, D-Alton) allows an association to correct an error, omission, or inconsistency in the community instruments of the association by an amendment adopted by vote of two-thirds of the board of directors without a membership vote. This applies to correct an omission, error, or inconsistency so that the community instruments conform to the Act or to another applicable law. Effective January 1, 2017.

 

Public Act 99-567

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act and the Condominium Property Act

(Haine, D-Alton; Martwick, D-Chicago) allows a board to close any portion of a noticed meeting or meet separately from a noticed meeting to do the following: (1) “Discuss” instead of “consider” appointment, employment, engagement, or dismissal of an employee, independent contractor, agent, or other provider of goods and services. (2) Interview a potential employee, independent contractor, agent, or other provider of goods and services. (3) Consult with the association’s legal counsel. Effective January 1, 2017. 

Public Act 99-569

Topic: 
Common Interest Community Association Act and the Condominium Property Act

(Mulroe, D-Chicago; Martwick, D-Chicago) provides that any assignment of a developer’s interest in the property is not effective until the successor obtains the assignment in writing and records it. Effective January 1, 2017.

 

Hampton v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District

Illinois Supreme Court
Civil Court
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act
Citation
Case Number: 
2016 IL 119861
Decision Date: 
Friday, July 8, 2016
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed; remanded.
Justice: 
GARMAN

Takings clause of Illinois Constitution provides greater protection for property owners than the takings clause in the U.S. Constitution, because it provides remedy for property that is damaged, as well as property that is taken. What constitutes a taking is the same under the takings clause in the Illinois Constitution and in the U.S. Constitution. Certified question on appeal is limited to the meaning of "takings" alone, not of damaged property within the Illinois takings clause. Thus, lower courts have not yet had the opportunity to review whether Plaintiffs have alleged a sufficient claim for compensation for damaged property. Remanded to allow circuit court to consider entirety of Plaintiffs' claim. U.S. Supreme Court's 2012 decision in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission is relevant to determination of whether government-induced temporary flooding is a taking pursuant to Illinois constitution. (THOMAS, KARNEIER, and THEIS, concurring; BURKE, FREEMAN, and KILBRIDE, specially concurring.)