Child Law

House Bill 3807

Topic: 
Juvenile Court Act of 1987
(Holbrooke, D-Belleville) requires a juvenile court to ensure that any position of and testimony from the Department of Children and Family Services about a change in custody is included in the court record of any juvenile court proceeding that may result in a change of custody. This bill has just been introduced and referred to the House Rules Committee.

House Bill 1604

Topic: 
Visitation abuse
(Howard, D-Chicago; Sullivan, D-Rushville) allows a court to order the following relief for visitation abuse: (1) suspend the defendant’s driving privileges; (2) suspend the defendant’s professional license; and (3) fine the defendant for not more than $500 as a petty offense; (4) requires a finding that a party engaged in visitation abuse constitutes “a change in circumstances of the child or his custodian” under Section 610 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution Act. It is scheduled for a hearing next week in Senate Judiciary Committee.

In re Diamond M.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Abuse and Neglect
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (1st) 111184
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 2d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CONNORS
(Court opinion corrected 9/8/11.) Court found minor neglected due to lack of care and injurious environment. Respondent had adopted minor, after serving as her foster mother, at age 3. Respondent failed to provide shelter for minor, as she refused to allow her back in home after hospital discharge and failed to find alternative residence, failed to visit minor during her two months of hospitalization. Thus, court's finding of neglect, rather than dependency, was not against manifest weight of evidence. (CUNNINGHAM and KARNEZIS, concurring.)

In re M.H.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (1st) 110196
Decision Date: 
Friday, August 12, 2011
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
CAHILL
Minor, an Indian child under Indian Child Welfare Act, was prenatally exposed to a controlled substance. Placement of child into non-Native foster home was in compliance with the Act, as Tribe's Indian child welfare caseworker approved placement. Court properly terminated parental rights of both parents, as they had signficant and long-term substance abuse history, failed to show interest in minor for lengthy period, and failed to follow recommendations for services offered. Court properly considered risk of emotional or physical harm reunification would present to minor as factor in termination decision. (GARCIA and R.E. GORDON, concurring.)

In re Marriage of Dorfman

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Removal
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (1st) 110099
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Will Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
O'BRIEN
Court properly considered five factors, as set forth in Supreme Court's Eckert case, in deciding removal petition. Court's finding that mother's motivation for requesting removal of children to Georgia was primarily and reasonably based upon her fear of father, given his history of substance abuse and behavioral problems, threats of violence, and repeated violations of orders of protection. Court did not fail to provide father with visitation, but advised parties that a visitation schedule would have to be reached regardless of outcome of petition for removal, and that either party could file motion requesting hearing on visitation. (CARTER and HOLDRIDGE, concurring.)

Public Act 97-493

Topic: 
Adoption forms
(Feigenholtz, D-Chicago; Wilhelmi, D-Joliet) changes the Final and Irrevocable Designated for Purposes of Adoption form to be used only by the "legal parents." Provides: a form of waiver of parental rights to be used by a putative father or a legal father of a born or unborn child. No action to void a waiver may be commenced after 12 months from the date the waiver was executed. Effective August 22, 2011.

In re S.D.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
2011 IL App (3d) 110184
Decision Date: 
Friday, August 5, 2011
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Peoria Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
WRIGHT
At close of termination hearing evidence, court found father unfit, based on father's previous criminal history, and then after best interest hearing found termination of father's parental rights was in best interests of minors. Court properly denied Respondent father's motion for recusal of judge, who was seated on bench while persons not involved in TPR proceedings discussed photographs presented by State during father's trial for murder of children's mother. No evidence that court based its finding of unfitness on any information other than certified copies of father's previous criminal convictions, which did not include murder conviction. Finding of best interests was not against manifest weight of evidence; father had been convicted of murder, and charge alleged that father stabbed mother in presence of one of the children and one other child, age five. (CARTER and LYTTON, concurring.)

Public Act 97-493

Topic: 
Adoption forms
(Feigenholtz, D-Chicago; Wilhelmi, D-Joliet) changes the Final and Irrevocable Designated for Purposes of Adoption form to be used only by the "legal parents." Provides a form of waiver of parental rights to be used by a putative father or a legal father of a born or unborn child. No action to void a waiver may be commenced after 12 months from the date the waiver was executed. Effective August 22, 2011.

Public Act 97-362

Topic: 
Juvenile justice
(Yarbrough, D-Maywood; Collins, D-Chicago) amends the Juvenile Court Act to reduce recidivism of troubled youth by encouraging juvenile courts to explore less restrictive alternatives before incarcerating them. It will also help Illinois recover federal IVe funds for services to delinquent youth. Effective January 1, 2012.

Public Act 97-294

Topic: 
Students, schools, and the courts
(Eddy, R-Hutsonville; Righter, R-Mattoon) makes several changes affecting students who are respondents under the Stalking No Contact Order Act, the Civil No Contact Order Act, and the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986. (1) Provides that the court may order that the respondent accept a change of educational placement or program, as determined by the school. (2) The respondent bears the burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence that the educational transfer, change of placement, or change of program of the respondent is not available. The respondent’s agreement is irrelevant to whether a remedy is “not available.” (3) The respondent must also share the burden for the expense, difficulty, and educational disruption caused by a transfer of the respondent to another school. (4) Provides that the court may make the parents, guardian, or legal custodian of the respondent responsible for costs associated with the respondent's placement under the order. (5) Prohibits a court in the enforcement of an order from holding a school district or private or non-public school or any of its employees in civil or criminal contempt unless the school district or private or non-public school has been allowed to intervene. (6) Allows a court to hold the parents, guardian, or legal custodian of the minor respondent in civil or criminal contempt for a violation of an order for conduct of the minor in violation of the Act if the parents, guardian, or legal custodian directed, encouraged, or assisted the minor in the conduct. Effective Januar 1, 2012.