Criminal Law

U.S. v. Correa

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Criminal Court
Search and Seizure
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 16-2316 & 16-2467 Cons.
Decision Date: 
November 5, 2018
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

In prosecution on drug and firearm charges, Dist. Ct. did not err in denying defendants’ motion to suppress seizure of drugs and firearms from one defendant’s condominium, where record showed that: (1) one defendant was lawfully stopped on traffic violation after said defendant had been observed by police making alleged drug transaction; (2) during search of car, officer found bag containing 4 garage door openers, 3 sets of keys and 4 cell phones; (3) officers arrested said defendant, took one garage door opener and began punching opener at various homes until garage door opened at condominium complex; and (4) after officer used key fob to gain access to lobby of condominium complex and then used mailbox key to identify defendant’s unit, police obtained consent of defendant to search his unit. While police use of garage door opener constituted search for 4th Amendment purposes, no violation occurred, where it opened garage shared by many residents of complex. Moreover, police use of key fob and mailbox key to identify defendant's unit was consistent with 4th Amendment.

People v. Moore

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Postconviction Petitions
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (3d) 160271
Decision Date: 
Monday, November 5, 2018
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Peoria Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.
Justice: 
CARTER

Defendant was convicted, after stipulated bench trial, of 1st degree murder of his estranged wife. Court summarily dismissed his pro se postconviction which alleged actual innocence based on newly discovered evidence. Defendant's recovered memory of events leading up to his wife's death did not constitute newly discovered evidence. Statements in petition do not establish the gist of a claim of self-defense. A defendant's claim of 2nd degree murder does not constitute a claim of actually innocence, as it does not completely exonerate Defendant of the offense in question and all related offenses. (McDADE and O'BRIEN, concurring.)

People v. Foxx

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Sentencing
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 162345
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3rd Div,
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
FITZGERALD SMITH

Defendant, age 15 at time of offense, was sentenced to 2 terms of life imprisonment for conviction of 2 counts of 1st degree murder and 2 counts of aggravated battery with a firearm. As Defendant was age 34 at time of his resentencing hearing, transfer to juvenile court would have proven impracticable. As Defendant's cause could not have been transferred to juvenile court under 2016 amendments to automatic transfer provision, Defendant failed to establish prejudice and ineffective assistance of counsel claims fail. Defendant chose to be sentenced under laws in 1997, the year he committed the offenses. Sentence is not vastly disproportionate to seriousness of the offenses. (HOWSE and COBBS, concurring.)

People v. Barajas

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Fines
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (3d) 160433
Decision Date: 
Thursday, November 1, 2018
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kankakee Co.
Holding: 
Vacated and remanded with directions.
Justice: 
LYTTON

Defendant was convicted of traffic offenses and sentenced to pay more than $2,000 in fines. Court considered Defendant's inability to pay and the amount of payments that Defendant had made in each case. Court erroneously expanded the good cause standard beyond inability to pay or hardship to include prior diligence as shown by portion of fines he had or had not previously paid. Remanded for court to consider only Defendant's allegations and evidence of inability to pay or hardship to determine if good cause to revoke fines. (McDADE, concurring; WRIGHT, dissenting.)

People v. Stewart

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Weapons
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (3d) 160205
Decision Date: 
Friday, November 2, 2018
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
LaSalle Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
WRIGHT

Defendant was convicted, after one-day jury trial, of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon and aggravated assault. Court did not abuse its discretion in denying jury's request for transcript of recorded testimony, and in encouraging jurors to rely on their own recollection of the evidence.  No ineffective assistance of counsel by counsel's failure to object to letter of certification that Defendant did not possess a valid FOID card. Record is devoid of any indication that Defendant did possess a valid FOID card. Counsel's inaction was consistent with his trial strategy that Defendant did not shoot a gun. (LYTTON and O'BRIEN, concurring.)

People v. Garza

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Fines and Costs
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (3d) 160684
Decision Date: 
Thursday, November 1, 2018
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
LaSalle Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
O'BRIEN

Court properly denied Defendant's motion to quash court costs and fines. Section 5-9-2 of Unified Code of Corrections allows a defendant to petition for revocation of a fine upon good cause shown. Defendant's laboratory analysis assessment is not a fine, but a fee. His substance abuse assessment is not subject to revocation under Section 5-9-2. His street value fine was completely offset by presentence custody credit Defendant received. (HOLDRIDGE and LYTTON, concurring.)

U.S. v. Downey

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Criminal Court
Supervised Release
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 17-3286
Decision Date: 
November 3, 2018
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

 

Dist. Ct. did not err in sentencing defendant to 57-month term of incarceration plus 3 years of supervised release on attempted robbery charge, even though defendant argued that two terms of supervised release were substantively unreasonable. Term that required that defendant refrain from using controlled substances and submit up to 104 drug tests per year of supervised release was reasonable in view of defendant’s 40 history of drug addiction, and Ct. rejected defendant’s contention that said term required up to 208 drug tests per year. Moreover, term that allowed probation officer to visit defendant at any “reasonable” time and at “reasonable” location specified by probation officer was consistent with Ct.’s decision in Henry, 813 F.3d 681.

U.S. v. Taylor

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Criminal Court
Sentencing
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 17-2986 & 17-3145 Cons.
Decision Date: 
October 31, 2018
Federal District: 
N.D. Ind., Hammond Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed

Dist. Ct. did not err in sentencing defendants to life imprisonment on felony murder charge involving elderly shop owner, even though both defendants argued that said sentences were substantively unreasonable due to their tragic childhoods that led them to life of crime. Sentences were within applicable guidelines, and Dist. Ct. otherwise thoroughly examined and rejected both defendants’ mitigation arguments. Also, Dist. Ct. could properly conclude that mitigation evidence was outweighed by severity of crime and need for deterrence.

People v. Lindsey

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Search & Seizure
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (3d) 150877
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, October 30, 2018
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Rock Island Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
McDADE

Dog sniff by drug-detection dog of door handle and seams of Defendant's motel room violated Defendant's reasonable expectation of privacy in his motel room and could not have been undertaken without a warrant. Heroin seized as a result of the sniff should have been suppressed, as case law were sufficient to have apprised a reasonably well-trained officer that this dog sniff violated 4th amendment. (O'BRIEN, concurring; SCHMIDT, concurring in party and dissenting in part.)

People v. Niffen

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Postconviction Petitions
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (4th) 150881
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Adams Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
CAVANAGH

Defendant entered negotiated guilty pleas to unlawful possession of a methamphetamine precursor and of anhydrous ammonia. In postconviction petition and affidavit, Defendant alleges that he wrote and mailed letter to defense counsel asking him to withdraw his guilty please, but that defense counsel never responded and never moved to withdraw guilty pleas. Defendant's failure to include a copy of his letter was not proper basis to reject his claims. Partial summary dismissal of a postconviction petition is not permitted. (DeARMOND and TURNER, concurring.)