Criminal Law

People v. Cardona

Illinois Supreme Court
Criminal Court
Illinois Sex Offender Registration Act
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL 114076
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 21, 2013
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Lake Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court affirmed.
Justice: 
THOMAS
The procedural safeguards of a discharge hearing, which are constitutionally sufficient to permit the extended treatment and possible involuntary commitment of an unfit defendant, are sufficient also to permit the sex offender certification of an unfit defendant. Sex offender registration is not punishment, but is a regulatory scheme designed to foster public safety. (KILBRIDE, FREEMAN, GARMAN, KARMEIER, BURKE, and THEIS, concurring.)

People v. Cruz

Illinois Supreme Court
Criminal Court
Postconviction Petitions
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL 113399
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 21, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed; remanded.
Justice: 
KILBRIDE
State alleged, for the first time on appeal, that Defendant's pro se supplemental postconviction petition was subject to dismissal because his verification affidavit was not notarized. State forfeited its argument by failing to raise issue of noncompliance with notarization requirement in trial court. Although State could not have raised issue in its original motion to dismiss, as the unnotarized affidavit was not submitted until later, the State could have sought to amend its motion to dismiss to include the issue. (THOMAS, GARMAN, KARMEIER, and THEIS, concurring.)

People v. Blair

Illinois Supreme Court
Criminal Court
Sentencing
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL 114122
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 21, 2013
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Henry Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed; circuit court affirmed.
Justice: 
THEIS
Public Act 95-688, effective October 2007, which amended the armed violence statute, revived the sentencing enhancement in the armed robbery statute. The legislature revived the unconstitutional armed violence predicated on robbery statute, by curing the proportionality violation through amendment of the comparison statute. (KILBRIDE, FREEMAN, THOMAS, GARMAN, KARMEIER, and BURKE, concurring.)

People v. Bailey

Illinois Supreme Court
Criminal Court
Verdicts
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL 113690
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 21, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed in part; circuit court vacated in part; remanded..
Justice: 
GARMAN
Court erred by refusing Defendant's request for separate verdict forms for felony murder. If jury had been given separate verdict forms and had acquitted Defendant of intentional or knowing murder, application of Section 9-1(b)(6) of Criminal Code would have been foreclosed as verdict would have negated an essential element of this eligibility factor for death penalty. Thus, error had consequences for Defendant's sentence of natural life without parole, and remedy is for sentence to be vacated, and remand for sentencing. (KILBRIDE, FREEMAN, THOMAS, KARMEIER, BURKE, and THEIS, concurring.)

People v. Kennebrew

Illinois Supreme Court
Criminal Court
Sexual Abuse
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL 113998
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 21, 2013
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Winnebago Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court affirmed.
Justice: 
GARMAN
Element of "sexual conduct" can reasonably be inferred from indictment language detailing sexual penetration. Elements considered by jury as to crime of predatory criminal sexual assault encompassed elements of crime of aggravated criminal sexual abuse, including element of "sexual conduct". Thus, appellate court did not render a verdict on an additional element not considered by the jury. (KILBRIDE, FREEMAN, THOMAS, KARMEIER, and BURKE, concurring.)

Admissibility of Dog-Sniff Evidence: Evaluating Probable Cause after Florida v. Harris

By David J. Robinson
April
2013
Article
, Page 194
In Harris, the U.S. Supreme Court held that dog-sniff evidence can be admissible even if prosecutors do not lay a detailed foundation that the dog is well trained.

U.S. v. Pietkiewicz

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Criminal Court
Sentencing
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 11-3296
Decision Date: 
March 21, 2013
Federal District: 
N.D. Ill., E. Div.
Holding: 
Vacated and remanded
Dist. Ct. erred in sentencing defendant to 71-month term of incarceration on mail fraud charge where said sentence was enhanced in part on defendant’s prior conduct that resulted in 6-month sentence on Ohio charge. Sections 5G1.3 and 5K2.23 of USSG instruct Dist. Ct. to consider downward variances if defendant’s sentence takes into account conduct for which defendant had received prior sentence, and Dist. Ct. failed to provide any explanation for denying defendant’s request for sentence reduction based on said Ohio imprisonment. On remand, Dist. Ct. is free to find that Ohio offense had no impact on instant sentence.

People v. Perez

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Postconviction Petitions
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (2d) 110306
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
HUTCHINSON
Trial court's judgment dismissing first-stage postconviction petition is void as untimely, if not rendered within 90 days. Even though order of dismissal was signed and dated on February 7, it was not date-stamped by circuit clerk until February 8. Public expression of trial court's action occurred, thus satisfying elements of effective court action, on February 8, when order was filed with circuit clerk, as record contains no explanation or commentary to support a public express of court's action on February 7. (McLAREN, concurring; HUDSON, dissenting.)

U.S. v. Stein

Federal 7th Circuit Court
Criminal Court
Evidence
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 12-2181
Decision Date: 
March 19, 2013
Federal District: 
E.D. Wisc.
Holding: 
Affirmed
In prosecution on unlawful possession of firearm charge under 18 USC section 922(g)(9) based upon prior misdemeanor conviction for domestic violence crime, Dist. Ct. did not err in excluding defendant’s proffered evidence that his lawyer in prior domestic violence prosecution had led him to believe that instant misdemeanor conviction would not disqualify him from possessing firearms. Under Lee, 437 F.3d 616, mens rea element of section 922(g) charge is satisfied by knowledge of possession of gun and does not require proof that defendant was aware of his status as prohibited person.

People v. Brown

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Search & Seizure
Citation
Case Number: 
2013 IL App (1st) 083158
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 3d Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Justice: 
PIERCE
Officers exceeded scope of a Terry stop by searching Defendant. Although a protective pat-down for weapons may be performed in a Terry stop, a general search may not; and immediate handcuffing of Defendant once in custody eliminated need to frisk him for safety. Thus search was improper, and court properly granted motion to quash arrest and suppress. Because doorknobs and remote control recovered in search were suppressed, State had no concrete evidence that Defendant committed burglary, and it would be essentially impossible for State to convict him of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. (NEVILLE and HYMAN, concurring.)