Child Law

In re H.C.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Adjudication of Wardship
Citation
Case Number: 
2023 IL App (1st) 220881
Decision Date: 
Thursday, June 8, 2023
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
4th Div./Cook Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
LAMPKIN

Respondent appealed from a trial court finding that the respondent’s minor children were abused and neglected under the Juvenile Court Act and ordering that two of her children be placed with DCFS and a third child placed with their biological father. The appellate court reversed and remanded, finding that the trial court committed reversable error where additional discovery, including more than 18,000 pages of medical records, was disclosed during the hearing on wardship and that respondent’s counsel was deficient when he failed to object to the late disclosure. (HOFFMAN and MARTIN, concurring)

House Bill 3425

Topic: 
Bullying

(Croke, D-Chicago; Feigenholtz, D-Chicago) amends the School Code provisions to include in the definition of bullying to include bullying based on physical appearance, socioeconomic status, academic status, pregnancy, parenting status, and homelessness. Requires that a school district’s bullying prevention policy must include procedures for informing parents or guardians of all students involved in the alleged incident of bullying within 24 hours after the school’s administration is made aware of the incident. Requires that all individual instances of bullying, as well as all threats, suggestions, or instances of self-harm be reported to the parents or legal guardians of those involved under the guidelines provided. Passed both chambers. 

House Bill 1555

Topic: 
GALs in the IMDMA

(Costa-Howard, D-Lombard; Halpin, D-Rock Island) amends the guardian ad litem statute in the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act to clarify and resolve issues with the duties of guardian ad litem. These changes are as follows:  (1) Requiring a written report or recommendations not less than 30 days before a final hearing or trial unless the court directs otherwise. It also allows the judge to direct that the GAL propose an allocation order in addition to the written report or recommendations. This is to prevent going to trial and having a “surprise” GAL recommendation at trial with no writing provided in advance. 
(2) It also states that the report or recommendations are to be admitted into evidence without the need for any foundation. 
(3) Allows the GAL, at the discretion of the court, to: (a) be present for all proceedings, including in-camera examinations of the child;
(b) issue subpoenas for records as part of his or her investigation; and 
(c) file pleadings relating to procedural matters. 

Passed both chambers. 
 

A Balancing Act

By Katharine Pancewicz
June
2023
Article
, Page 34
Corporal punishment of minors in Illinois: What’s excessive and what happens when the interests of parents and children compete?

House Bill 3253

Topic: 
Custodial interrogations

(Tarver, D-Chicago; Ventura, D-Joliet) amends the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 and the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 to expand the definition of “protected person” in provisions prohibiting certain deceptive tactics during custodial interrogation to include persons with severe or profound intellectual or developmental disabilities. Passed both chambers. 

House Bill 2607

Topic: 
Child testimony in criminal cases

(Niemerg, R-Teutopolis; Rose, R-Champaign) amends the Code of Criminal procedure to make a rebuttable presumption that the testimony of a victim who is a child under 13 years of age may testify outside the courtroom to be shown in the courtroom by means of closed-circuit television. This presumption may be overcome if the defendant can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the child victim will not suffer severe emotional distress. Before the court permits the testimony of victims under this Section by means of a closed-circuit television, the court must make a finding that the testimony does not prejudice the defendant. Passed both chambers. 

House Bill 1555

Topic: 
IMDMA and GALs

(Costa-Howard, D-Lombard; Halpin, D-Rock Island) amends the guardian ad litem statute in the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act to clarify and resolve issues with the duties of guardian ad litem. These changes are as follows:

● Requiring a written report or recommendations not less than 30 days before a final hearing or trial unless the court directs otherwise. It also allows the judge to direct that the GAL propose an allocation order in addition to the written report or recommendations. This is to prevent going to trial and having a “surprise” GAL recommendation at trial with no writing provided in advance. 

● It also states that the report or recommendations are to be admitted into evidence without the need for any foundation.

● Allows the GAL, at the discretion of the court, to:

(a) be present for all proceedings, including in-camera examinations of the child;

(b) issue subpoenas for records as part of his or her investigation; and

(c) file pleadings relating to procedural matters.

House Bill 1555 has passed both chambers. 

In re V.S.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Adjudication of Wardship
Citation
Case Number: 
2023 IL App (1st) 220817
Decision Date: 
Friday, May 5, 2023
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
6th Div./Cook Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
ODEN JOHNSON

Respondent father appealed from an adjudication finding neglect as to his minor child and a dispositional order adjudicating the minor a ward of the court. On appeal, respondent argued that the adjudicatory finding of neglect was improper and deprived him of due process where the petition made no allegations against him, that the finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence, and that the order should be reversed because the circuit court failed to provide a factual basis for its disposition. The appellate court affirmed, finding that respondent’s arguments relating to the adjudicatory determination were moot because he did not challenge the court’s finding of dependency and that his arguments on that issue were without merit. The appellate court further found that the record supported the trial court’s finding that respondent was not able to care for the minor child at the time of the dispositional hearing and, as a result, it was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. (C.A. WALKER and TAILOR, concurring)

In re Y.F.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
2023 IL App (1st) 221216
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, March 14, 2023
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
2d Div./Cook Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
ELLIS

Respondent appealed from an order of the circuit court terminating her parental rights on the basis that she failed to show reasonable interest, concern, or responsibility for her minor child. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that the trial court’s order was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the record supported a finding that the respondent did not fully engage with the required parent and therapy services, did not appropriately engage with her daughter, and was unable to comply with requirements regarding substance abuse. (FITZGERALD SMITH and COBBS, concurring)