Criminal Law

House Bill 5341

Topic: 
Expungement

(Gordon-Booth, D-Peoria; Harmon, D-Oak Park) prohibits a court from denying a sealing or expungement petition because the petitioner has not satisfied an outstanding legal financial obligation established by a court; law enforcement agency; or state, county, or other unit of local government. It exempts an obligation that is court-ordered restitution unless the restitution has been converted to a civil judgment. Passed both chambers. 

Senate Bill 558

Topic: 
Domestic violence orders of protection

(Sims, D-Chicago; Connor, D-Romeoville) authorizes the state’s attorney to file a petition for a domestic violence order of protection on behalf of any minor child or dependent adult in the care of the named victim, if the named victim does not file a petition or request the State's Attorney file the petition. Provides that the respondent may rebut prima facie evidence of the offense by presenting evidence of a meritorious defense. Provides that the respondent shall file a written notice alleging a meritorious defense, which shall be verified and supported by affidavit. Provides that if the court finds that the evidence presented at the hearing establishes a meritorious defense by a preponderance of the evidence, the court may decide not to issue a protective order. Passed both chambers. 

House Bill 1804

Topic: 
Car-jacking

(Andrade, D-Chicago; John Cullerton, D-Chicago) amends the Illinois Vehicle Code to provide that knowledge that a vehicle or essential part is stolen or converted may be inferred: (1) from the surrounding facts and circumstances, which would lead a reasonable person to believe that the vehicle or essential part is stolen or converted; or (2) if the person exercises exclusive unexplained possession over the stolen or converted vehicle or essential part, regardless of whether the date on which the vehicle or essential part was stolen is recent or remote. Amends the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 to provide that for a minor arrested or taken into custody for vehicular hijacking or aggravated vehicular hijacking, a previous finding of delinquency for vehicular hijacking or aggravated vehicular hijacking be given greater weight in determining whether secured custody of a minor is a matter of immediate and urgent necessity for the protection of the minor or of the person or property of another. Passed by chambers. 

House Bill 4594

Topic: 
Court fees and fines

(Andersson, R-Geneva; Mulroe, D-Chicago) creates the Criminal and Traffic Assessment Act. The Act would standardize court-filing fees and fines into 13 schedules of potential assessments for criminal and traffic offenses, and four schedules for civil court cases, which are divided by the kind of offense or case. The Act also caps the maximum amount of money that can be assessed under each schedule and for various services or filings within the court process. The money collected under these assessment schedules would then be distributed at the state, county, and local levels for officials to decide how to best allocate their portion for maintaining the courts. House Bill 4594 would also provide a sliding-scale waiver for some civil litigants and criminal defendants depending on their income relative to the federal poverty level. House Bill 544 (Mulroe, D-Chicago; Andersson, R-Geneva) is a trailer bill to resolve technical concerns. Both bills passed both chambers. 

Senate Bill 2332

Topic: 
Minors and tobacco products

(Morrison, D-Deerfield; Lilly, D-Chicago) raises the age from 18 to 21 who may buy tobacco products, electronic cigarettes, and alternative nicotine products. Eliminates the penalty for possession of a cigar, cigarette, smokeless tobacco, or tobacco in any of its forms by persons under 18 years of age. Passed both chambers. 

 

People v. Anderson

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Possession of Weapons
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (4th) 160037
Decision Date: 
Wednesday, May 30, 2018
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Macon Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed in part and vacated in part; remanded with directions.
Justice: 
HARRIS

Defendant was convicted of armed violence, unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon, and unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Prosecutor's statement, that Defendant did not "continually deny having the gun", was a rebutting of defense counsel's statement that Defendant, during his police interview, "continually denied" knowing anything about the gun, which State contends was a mischaracterization of Defendant's interview responses. Defendant's 16-year sentence is not of the same or similar severity as those in U.S. Supreme Court decisions which were de facto life sentences. Evidence was sufficient to support an inference Defendant intended to deliver cocaine and cannabis, given that drugs were individually wrapped packages, and he was carrying more than he could consume himself.(STEIGMANN and DeARMOND, concurring.)

People v. Cunningham

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Weapons
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (1st) 153367
Decision Date: 
Friday, June 8, 2018
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 6th Div.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
conn

Defendant was convicted, after bench trial, with unlawful use of a weapon by a felon and aggravated use of a firearm, after Chicago police officers observed him loading a shotgun. The failure of police to preserve potentially useful evidence is not a denial of due process. No evidence that police destroyed Defendant's Bulls jacket intentionally or in bad faith. No evidence that failure to inventory jacket or ID, or destruction of jacket, was a discovery violation. As Defendant withdrew his specific request to exclude testimony as to the jacket, court's decision to deny his motion to dismiss, and not impose any other sanctions, was not an abuse of discretion.(CUNNINGHAM and DELORT, concurring.)

People v. Whitfield

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Battery
Citation
Case Number: 
2018 IL App (4th) 150948
Decision Date: 
Friday, June 8, 2018
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Macon Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
HARRIS

Defendant was convicted, after jury trial, of aggravated battery of a child (his son, age 2). No error in court admitting and playing for the jury portions of his videotaped interrogation. The challenged statements of and questions by officers in video were not hearsay, as they were not offered for the truth of the matters asserted, but provided contest for what happened during interrogation and were useful in explaining Defendant's statements and admissions that he struck his son on his bare buttocks, with a belt made of thin leather.(STEIGMANN and DeARMOND, concurring.)