Child Law

In re S.A.M.

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
2021 IL App (3d) 210066
Decision Date: 
Friday, July 16, 2021
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Knox Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
O'BRIEN

Court found Respondent mother unfit and terminated her parental rights as to her minor child. Juvenile petition alleged that minor was born with opiates and THC in her system, and that cocaine and hydrocodone had been found in the home with the minor. Mother received proper notice of the period in which she was required to show that she made reasonable progress toward the return of the minor. Mother had numerous unexcused missed drug screens and positive drug screens. As the mother's substance abuse was the primary condition that gave rise to the removal of the minor, court's conclusion that mother was not making reasonable progress due to her continuing drug use during relevant time frame was not against manifest weight of evidence. (DAUGHERITY, concurring; McDADE, concurring in part and dissenting in part.)

Public Act 102-480

Topic: 
IMDMA and interim fees

(Stoneback; D-Skokie; Crowe, D-Maryville) creates an avenue to include an allowance from the other party for an initial retainer fee to obtain an attorney. The request must include an affidavit from the attorney to be retained that the attorney has been contacted by the moving party and the attorney has agreed to enter an appearance if the request is granted. The party must also include a certificate that the interim fees will be used only for retaining the attorney. Effective Jan. 1, 2022.

House Bill 2741

Topic: 
IMDMA counseling cleanup

(Ness, D-Carpentersville; Hastings, D-Frankfort) amends the unintended consequences of Section 607.6(d) of the IMDMA.  As currently written, it bars all information from therapy getting out. All information. Even if the court orders a guardian to talk to a therapist, the guardian and information are barred regardless of whether the parties sign releases. House Bill 2741 deletes subparagraph (d) and provides that the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act and the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 protect the confidentiality and release of this kind of information. The Governor signed House Bill 2741 into law on Aug. 13, 2021 and it took effect immediately. 

House Bill 4121

Topic: 
IMDMA GALs

(West, D-Rockford) requires any individual serving in the role of guardian ad litem or child representative to meet with both parties and the child every 90 days. Provides that the first meeting shall occur within 90 days of appointment and a meeting shall occur in every subsequent 90-day period until the conclusion of the case. Requires the GAL or child representative to file with the court, within 90 days of his or her appointment and once in every subsequent 90-day period during the course of his or her representation, a document confirming that the GAL or child representative has met with both parties. House Bill 4121 was just introduced. 

People v. Dorsey

Illinois Supreme Court
Criminal Court
Juvenile Sentencing
Citation
Case Number: 
2021 IL 123010
Decision Date: 
Thursday, July 29, 2021
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court affirmed.
Justice: 
M. BURKE

Defendant, age 14 at time of shooting, was convicted, after jury trial, of 1 count of 1st degree murder and 2 counts of attempted 1st degree murder and sentenced to a 76-year aggregate term. Good-conduct credit is relevant to the determination of what constitutes a de facto life sentence for a juvenile offender. A sentence imposed pursuant to a statutory scheme that affords a juvenile an opport5unity to be released after 40 years or less of the term imposed is not a de facto life sentence.(A. BURKE, GARMAN, THEIS, OVERSTREET, and CARTER, concurring; NEVILLE, dissenting.)

Senate Bill 2122

Topic: 
Juvenile Justice

 (Peters, D-Chicago; Slaughter, D-Chicago) presumes it to be inadmissible if a minor makes a confession during a custodial interrogation if a law enforcement officer knowingly engages in deception. “Deception” is defined as the knowing communication of false facts about evidence or unauthorized statements regarding leniency. The Governor signed this bill yesterday. Effective Jan. 1, 2022.

Senate Bill 64

Topic: 
Juvenile Justice

(Peters, D-Chicago; Ammons, D-Champaign) creates a limited legal privilege for communications in restorative justice proceedings so that participation in a proceeding is protected and may not be used in any future proceedings unless the privilege is waived by the informed consent of the party or parties covered by the privilege. There are now three restorative justice community courts that Chief Judge Tim Evans has set up for young adults with misdemeanor and nonviolent felony charges in Cook County. It took effect on the Governor's signature yesterday. 

Public Act 102-87

Topic: 
IMDMA and Children's Health Insurance

(Hastings, D-Frankfort; Burke, D-Oak Lawn) ensures that children whose parents are divorced or never married have public or private health insurance when child support is determined by requiring the parents to obtain health insurance or maintain existing health insurance coverage for the child. Effective Jan. 1, 2022.

People v. Robinson

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Juvenile Sentencing
Citation
Case Number: 
2021 IL App (1st) 181653
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, June 1, 2021
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 1st Div.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
WALKER

Defendant, age 17 at time of offense, made negotiated plea of guilty to 3 counts of 1st degree murder and 1 count of attempted 1st degree murder, and was sentenced to a 35-year term for murder, to be served at 100%, and to run concurrently with a 30-year sentence for attempted murder. Defendant filed pro se postconviction petition alleging that trial counsel was arguably ineffective and his plea was involuntary because court misapprehended correct sentencing range. Defendant's initial claim that he was substantially denied due process and equal protection, fair sentencing, and cruel and unusual punishment where Miller v. Alabama requirements, as to his youth, were not considered before accepting his plea, was sufficient to state an arguable claim that hi8s plea was secured by the threat of a de facto life sentence, and stated the gist of a constitutional claim. Defendant's plea was influenced by court's admonishment of a de facto life sentence without first complying with youth-related requirements stated in Miller v. Alabama. (PIERCE and COGHLAN, concurring.)