Child Law

In re Jessica M., a Minor

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Juvenile Law
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 1-06-2007
Decision Date: 
Friday, March 19, 2010
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co., 5th Div.
Holding: 
Vacated and remanded
Justice: 
TOOMIN
Respondent minor was adjudicated delinquent for two counts of aggravated battery. One-act, one-crime act applies in juvenile proceedings, thus one conviction must be vacated as both counts were based on single act. DNA indexing statute not unconstitutional on grounds of unreasonable search and seizure, or violations of right to privacy under federal or state constitutions. Statute does not authorize gathering of uniquely private genetic facts; and Illinois State Police regulation allows use of genetic marker grouping information only if all personal identifying information is removed.

Bolger v. The Department of Children and Family Services

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Abuse and Neglect
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 2-08-0958
Decision Date: 
Monday, March 29, 2010
District: 
2d Dist.
Division/County: 
Kane Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
SCHOSTOK
Finding of medical neglect as to foster mother for not obtaining immediate medical treatment for mentally and physically handicapped 10-year-old boy with spina bifida, who suffered burns on chest, neck, and back from scalding bathwater. Foster mother, who is an LPN, had cleaned burned area with soap and applied cream, and intended to take child to doctor when child's father arrived and took him to ER three days after incident. Medical testimony established child had first and second degree burns, and that his condition, if untreated, could have caused serious or long-term harm due to risk of infection, thus supporting finding of medical neglect.

In re C.H., L.H., and W.H., Minors

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Termination of Parental Rights
Evidence
Citation
Case Number: 
Nos. 3-08-0529, 3-08-0534 & 3-08-0535 Co
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 18, 2010
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Tazewell Co.
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
O'BRIEN
During permanency review hearing as to mother's fitness to parent her three children, trial court asked that recordings of telephone conversations between parents be played. State alleged unfitness was evidenced by mother's use of abusive, vulgar language which was in presence of her child, as a child's voice could be heard in background. Court erred in admitting recordings, as they lacked proper foundation, as no testimony as to whose voices were on recordings, and whether they were unaltered and accurate recordings.

People v. Santiago

Illinois Supreme Court
Criminal Court
Professional Conduct
Motions to Suppress
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 107391
Decision Date: 
Thursday, March 18, 2010
District: 
1st Dist.
Division/County: 
Cook Co.
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed and remanded.
Justice: 
THOMAS
Mother arrested for child endangerment of her infant daughter, and made inculpatory statements to ASA. Motion to suppress properly denied because at time of statements, mother was not represented by counsel. Rule 4.2 of Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits attorney representing a client from communicating with a party on the subject of the representation if attorney knows that party is to be represented by another lawyer in that matter, is inapplicable because civil juvenile proceeding and criminal proceeding are different, even though they were based on same incident, and attorney appointed in child-protection case was not representing the mother in the criminal matter.

In re: Tyler G., a Minor

Illinois Appellate Court
Criminal Court
Juvenile Law
Miranda Warnings
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 4-09-0353
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
McLean Co.
Holding: 
Affirmed.
Justice: 
MYERSCOUGH
Miranda warnings not required during police questioning of 12-year old residential burglary suspect; questioning occurred in kitchen of minor's grandmother's house, where minor resided, and with grandmother present, for 30 minutes, thus was not "custodial interrogation". Trial court properly denied motion to suppress minor's admission, during questioning, that he took jewelry and bicycle.

Walk v. The Illinois Department of Children and Family Services

Illinois Appellate Court
Civil Court
Abuse and Neglect
Administrative Review
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 4-08-0835
Decision Date: 
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
District: 
4th Dist.
Division/County: 
Sangamon
Holding: 
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Justice: 
KNECHT
"Close confinement" conduct which is considered child abuse is dependent upon circumstances, including factors of length of time children are confined, whether children are deprived of food and water and bathroom use, purpose, and space. DCFS Policy Guide 2000.14, which has not been properly promulgated with period for public comment, is not a rule for purposes of Section 1-70 of Administrative Procedure Act, and thus cannot form basis for court's analysis of alleged abuse and neglect. Trial court improperly adopted ALJ's findings of abuse and neglect, as confinement of children with serious behavior disorders in outdoor enclosure for brief periods of time while foster parent was doing farm chores or tending to horses was not unreasonable close confinement.

In re J.L., Minors

Illinois Supreme Court
Civil Court
Adoption Act
Termination of Parental Rights
Citation
Case Number: 
No. 108575
Decision Date: 
Friday, February 19, 2010
District: 
3d Dist.
Division/County: 
Peoria
Holding: 
Appellate court reversed.
Justice: 
FREEMAN
Time for parent to make reasonable progress toward return of child, under Adoption Act, is not tolled by parent's incarceration, as Act includes no exception for time spent in prison. Court may consider evidence occurring only during the relevant nine-month period described in section 1(D)(m) of Act.

Child Law

The mission of ISBA Child Law Section